People v. Seymour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the injury suffered by the plaintiff was not separate and distinct from injuries suffered by other PCI investors
• observing that “the harm sustained by the Petters entities as a result of fraudulent withdrawals from their accounts of other lenders’ funds was its insolvency and inability to repay its creditors”
• observing that “the harm sustained by the Petters entities as a result of fraudulent withdrawals from their accounts of other lenders’ funds was its insolvency and inability to repay its creditors”
• observing that “the harm sustained by the Petters entities as a result of fraudulent withdrawals from their accounts of other lenders’ funds was its insolvency and inability to repay its creditors”
• observing that “the harm sustained by the Petters entities as a result of fraudulent withdrawals from their accounts of other lenders’ funds was its insolvency and inability to repay its creditors”
• adopting the reasoning of the Seventh Circuit in Grede that this issue involves statutory authority as opposed to justiciability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).