People v. Seidel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the defendant’s grandmother had a sufficient relationship to the defendant’s room to consent to its search when she stored some of her own belongings there
• the defendant's grandmother had a sufficient relationship to the defendant's room to consent to its search when she stored some of her own belongings there

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Mahaffey
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-03-23· cited 89×
• People v. Goforth
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1997-05-22· cited 37×
• People v. Sanders
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-12-17· cited 27×
• State v. Hambrick
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1986-11-12· cited 8×
• People v. Callaway
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-04-18· cited 7×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Matlock
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
• Stoner v. California
  Supreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 1,576×
• People v. Heflin
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-05-26· cited 96×
• People v. Nunn
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1973-10-01· cited 81×
• People v. Stacey
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1974-09-17· cited 56×
• People v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-10-25· cited 21×
• People v. Shaffer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-12-14· cited 15×
• People v. Salyer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-01-07· cited 12×
• People v. Nolan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-04-11· cited 8×