Skip to main content
· 6/26/2009

People v. Sean N.

Citations

  • 911 N.E.2d 1094
  • 391 Ill. App. 3d 1104
  • 331 Ill. Dec. 864
  • 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a respondent in a proceeding for involuntary administration of treatment was not entitled to hybrid representation
  • holding that a respondent in a proceeding for involuntary administration of treatment was not entitled to hybrid representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.