People v. Seales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that New York Times does not apply to a promissory estoppel claim seeking damages for economic rather than emotional or reputational harm
• holding that the first amendment does not prohibit a plaintiff from recovering damages under state promissory estoppel law against a newspaper for publication of information
• holding that the first amendment does not prohibit a plaintiff from recovering damages under state promissory estop-pel law against a newspaper for publication of information
• concluding that First Amendment did not bar economic damages resulting from defendant's tortious breach of promise
• concluding that First Amendment did not bar economic damages resulting from defendant's tortious breach of promise
• holding that court enforcement of a settlement agreement is not state action for constitutional purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).