People v. Scutt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The requisite intent to defraud may be inferred from the fact that defendant indicated on the recertification form that his daughter resided with him when he knew that she did not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Afia
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 2007-09-26· cited 2×
• People v. Rafferty
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-11-09· cited 1×
• People v. Thompson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-10-17· cited 1×
• People v. Freeland
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2023-02-03· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Bleakley
  New York Court of Appeals· 1987-05-07· cited 13,541×
• People v. Baldi
  New York Court of Appeals· 1981-10-29· cited 6,191×
• People v. Johnson
  New York Court of Appeals· 2000-10-26· cited 99×
• People v. Simmons
  New York Court of Appeals· 1998-06-09· cited 35×
• People v. Stumbrice
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-06-17· cited 24×
• People v. Montroy
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-03-14· cited 7×
• People v. Simonton
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-11-19· cited 6×