People v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “Lawrence dealt only with sodomy between consenting adults of the same sex” and “did not deal with other matters pertaining to sex”
• Lawrence had no impact on laws prohibiting sexual relationships where “consent might not easily be refused.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Marriage Cases
  California Supreme Court· 2008-05-15· cited 139×
• State Of Washington, V. Ian Anthony Gantt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2024-01-02· cited 13×
• Lowe v. Swanson
  N.D. Ohio· 2009-07-07· cited 3×
• The People v. McEvoy
  California Court of Appeal· 2013-04-15· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 2,492×
• Lawrence v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 1,452×
• Allen A. Muth v. Matthew J. Frank, Secretary
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-06-22· cited 96×
• State v. Kaiser
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-05-03· cited 21×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1999-03-25· cited 19×
• State v. John M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-04-11· cited 14×
• State v. Geddes
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1957-11-26· cited 11×