People v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating a history of alcoholism may be considered as evidence the defendant’s conduct is likely to recur
• defendant was charged with reckless homicide and the court found his prior drug use to be evidence of prior criminal activity
• “A defendant’s history of alcoholism may also be considered as evidence that his conduct is likely to recur.”
• “A defendant’s history of alcoholism may also be considered as evidence that his conduct is likely to recur.”
• defendant was charged with reckless homicide and the court found his prior drug use to be evidence of prior criminal activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Young
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-01· cited 20×
• People v. Arbuckle
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2016-10-05· cited 13×
• People v. Tross
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-06-07· cited 8×
• People v. Flanery
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-04-19· cited 6×
• People v. Arbuckle
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-06-02· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Cox
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-10-17· cited 580×
• People v. Saldivar
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-09-17· cited 381×
• Pedople v. Pittman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-10-22· cited 129×
• People v. Anderson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-03-19· cited 55×
• People v. Whealon
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-07-18· cited 16×
• People v. Allen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-11-16· cited 16×
• People v. Clune
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-03-28· cited 2×