Skip to main content

People v. Scott

Citations

  • 439 N.E.2d 130
  • 108 Ill. App. 3d 607
  • 64 Ill. Dec. 201
  • 1982 Ill. App. LEXIS 2183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that a witness was incompetent due to senility, despite his testimony being “at times unresponsive and confusing,” where he had the ability to “observe, recollect, and communicate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mejda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.