People v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the court’s bar of defendant’s disclosed witness was reversible error when a continuance would have cured any prejudice the State 9 suffered, despite the disclosure coming the same day of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Sutton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-06-23· cited 20×
• People v. Tally
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-06-24· cited 20×
• People v. Turner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-08-22· cited 15×
• People v. Stolberg
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-11-12· cited 8×
• People v. Schlott
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-07-22· cited 8×
• People v. Baker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-04-23
• People v. Ramsey
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2010-10-07

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Taylor v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
• People v. Olivera
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-01-19· cited 241×
• Boatmen's National Bank v. Martin
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1993-05-20· cited 111×
• People v. Rayford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-11-01· cited 62×
• People v. Mullen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-05-22· cited 53×
• People v. Brooks
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-01-08· cited 33×
• People v. Houser
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-05-28· cited 31×
• People v. Damico
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-11-24· cited 27×
• People v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-05-17· cited 26×
• People v. Hawkins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-10-07· cited 23×
• People v. Foster
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-03-27· cited 23×
• People v. White
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-30· cited 19×
• People v. Tinoco
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-06-27· cited 17×
• People v. Cannon
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-06-11· cited 3×