People v. Scofield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 18-1-409(1) bars review of sentence imposed in the aggravated range where, as part of a plea agreement, “the parties expressly agreed that defendant would be sentenced within the aggravated sentencing range”
• dismissing the appeal under section 18-1-409(1) because the 3 defendant sought review of the propriety of her sentence, which was within the agreed-upon range in the plea agreement
• declining to apply O’Dell where the parties’ entered a plea agreement providing that “defendant would be sentenced within the aggravated sentencing range for” the offense to which he was pleading guilty
• dismissing the appeal under section 18-1-409(1) because the defendant sought review of the propriety of her sentence, which was within the range agreed upon by the parties in the plea agreement
• dismissing the appeal under section 18-1-409(1) because the defendant sought review of the propriety of her sentence, which was within the range agreed upon by the parties in the plea agreement
• the plea proviso did apply where the parties “expressly agreed upon” a sentencing range, even though that range was the same as the statutory aggravated sentencing range

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).