New York Court of Appeals· 2/25/1993
People v. Scocco
Citations
- 80 N.Y.2d 738
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The traditional pen register was, to a large extent, self-regulating. Neither through police misconduct nor through inadvertence could it reveal to anyone any information in which the telephone user had a legitimate .expectation of privacy.”
- “While CPL 700.50(3) requires written notice, the failure to comply should not result in an order of suppression here when defendant had oral notice of the eavesdropping within the statutory period . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. MillerSecond Circuit· 1997-06-20· cited 142×
- People v. CapolongoNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-02-21· cited 29×
- People v. FonvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-10-02· cited 22×
- United States v. GottiS.D. New York· 1999-03-16· cited 20×
- People v. MartelloNew York Court of Appeals· 1999-07-06· cited 16×
- United States v. LoveS.D. New York· 1994-08-09· cited 15×
- People v. KramerNew York Court of Appeals· 1998-11-20· cited 15×
- People v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-06-10· cited 14×
- People v. PalmeriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-05-10· cited 11×
- People v. GiordanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-01-30· cited 8×
- In Re Orders (1) Authorizing Use of Pen RegistersE.D. New York· 2007-09-18· cited 7×
- People v. GilpinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-06-13· cited 5×
- People v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-12-13· cited 5×
- People v. OrzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-04-15· cited 4×
- People v. LaMendolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-11-16· cited 4×
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-02-16· cited 4×
- People v. VaracalliNew York Supreme Court· 1993-04-05· cited 4×
- People v. LifrieriNew York Supreme Court· 1993-03-26· cited 4×
- People v. SalzaruloNew York Supreme Court· 1996-01-30· cited 4×
- People v. RaventosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-12-20· cited 3×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 1,212×
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court· 1977-12-07· cited 871×
- People v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals· 1978-12-07· cited 50×
- People v. GallinaNew York Court of Appeals· 1985-10-15· cited 36×
- People v. LiberatoreNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-02-25· cited 31×
- People v. SchulzNew York Court of Appeals· 1986-03-27· cited 28×
- People v. WinogradNew York Court of Appeals· 1986-11-20· cited 25×
- Quinn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 15×
- People v. HuestonNew York Court of Appeals· 1974-05-02· cited 11×
Other cases named People v. Scocco
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.