People v. Schuldt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence not properly barred by the rape-shield statute \remain[s] subject to standards of relevancy\
• holding evidence not properly barred by the rape-shield statute “remain[s] subject to standards of relevancy”
• leading questions in an aggravated criminal sexual assault case were harmless error “under the circumstances presented”
• where defendant claimed that conduct charged was not sexual assault but rather consensual sado-masochistic sexual intercourse, details of prior non-forceful consensual sexual intercourse between defendant and complainant were irrelevant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).