Skip to main content

People v. Schrader

Citations

  • 898 P.2d 33
  • 19 Brief Times Rptr. 1072
  • 1995 Colo. LEXIS 272
  • 1995 WL 365030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the search of the defendant's property was legal, the later statements to a detective based on that search were not inadmissible under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine
  • reversing a suppression order because the court did “not agree with the trial court’s analysis and reasons for entering the suppression order”
  • reversing a suppression order because the court did \not agree with the trial court's analysis and reasons for entering the suppression order\
  • sufficient particularity in the context of location enables the officer executing the warrant to “identify the place intended with reasonable effort”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.