Skip to main content
· 2/13/2015

People v. Scholz

Citations

  • 125 A.D.3d 1492
  • 3 N.Y.S.3d 860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding local law preempted where “the City could impose' various penalties” (emphasis added)
  • “The City Council explains its interest as economic.... Defendants, however, have not demonstrated that the City, rather than individual borrowers, would benefit financially[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.