California Supreme Court· 6/29/2006
People v. Saunders
Citations
- 136 P.3d 859
- 45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 66
- 38 Cal. 4th 1129
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- agreeing with our analysis in Ramstad that California requires passenger vehicles to display both license plates
- “[T]he lack of a front 19 license plate has long been recognized as a legitimate basis for a traffic stop.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baxter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. Letner and TobinCalifornia Supreme Court· 2010-07-29· cited 530×
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-12-11· cited 80×
- United States v. MartinezTenth Circuit· 2008-01-15· cited 46×
- People v. Raymond C.California Supreme Court· 2008-12-11· cited 26×
- People v. VIBANCOCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-04-30· cited 23×
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-10-10· cited 15×
- People v. Carleisha P.California Court of Appeal· 2006-11-09· cited 13×
- People v. DotsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-11-30· cited 10×
- People v. ReyesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-06-17· cited 10×
- People v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-04-25· cited 2×
- In Re Raymond C.California Court of Appeal· 2006-12-20· cited 1×
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-12-18· cited 1×
- People v. HarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-08-10
- Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2023-07-03
- People v. ValleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2024-09-18
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 1,555×
- People v. LeybaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-06-25· cited 319×
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-05-19· cited 257×
- United States v. Patrick Nolan McSwainTenth Circuit· 1994-07-11· cited 235×
- People v. CelisCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-07-26· cited 173×
- State v. ChildsNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-02-12· cited 78×
- People v. Arturo D.California Supreme Court· 2002-01-24· cited 69×
- State v. GulickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-10-06· cited 53×
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-05-15· cited 51×
- United States v. RamstadTenth Circuit· 2002-10-24· cited 31×
- State v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-11-13· cited 28×
- People v. OdegardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-05-09· cited 28×
- People v. CartwrightCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-06-16· cited 27×
- People v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-11-12· cited 18×
- People v. BrendlinCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 18×
- People v. ArteagaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-08-15· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.