Skip to main content
· 2/4/1998

People v. Satz

Citations

  • 61 Cal. App. 4th 322
  • 71 Cal. Rptr. 2d 433
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 1283
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 965
  • 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 88

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that hotel occupant “not legitimately on the premises” was a trespasser and therefore “has no legitimate expectation of privacy in the room, or an expectation that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yegan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.