People v. Santa Ana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing plaintiff’s retaliation claim after her failure to follow call-in procedure led to her termination despite her preexisting approval for intermittent FMLA leave
• dismissing plaintiff’s retaliation claim after her failure to follow call-in procedure led to her termination despite her preexisting approval for intermittent FMLA leave
• “‘FMLA regulations effective January 16, 2009 ... explicitly permit[ ] employers to condition FMLA-protected leave upon an employee's compliance with the employer's usual notice and procedural requirements, absent unusual circumstances.’”
• “‘FMLA regulations effective January 16, 2009 ... explicitly permit[ ] employers to condition FMLA-protected leave upon an employee's compliance with the employer's usual notice and procedural requirements, absent unusual circumstances.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).