Skip to main content

Citations

  • 80 A.D.3d 1077
  • 915 N.Y.S.2d 758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that sentencing court probably considered improper materials because it expressly mentioned them
  • finding that sentencing court probably considered improper materials because it expressly mentioned them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.