· 5/13/2005
People v. SALOMON MUNOZ
Citations
- 28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 295
- 129 Cal. App. 4th 421
- 2005 Daily Journal DAR 5580
- 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4093
- 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 766
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the “fact of a prior . . . commitment does not change the fundamental issues to be litigated in extended commitment proceedings”
- holding that the “fact of a prior . . . commitment does not change the fundamental issues to be litigated in extended commitment proceedings”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.