Skip to main content
· 5/9/1980

People v. Sakalas

Citations

  • 405 N.E.2d 1121
  • 85 Ill. App. 3d 59
  • 40 Ill. Dec. 29
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 3027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Exigent circumstances existed partly because the officers knew that defendant had used a pipe to violently beat the victim, even though they had no reason to believe that he was armed when arrested
  • exigent circumstances existed partly because the officers knew that the defendant had used a pipe to violently beat the victim, even though they had no reason to believe that he was armed when arrested
  • Exigent circumstances existed partly because the officers knew that defendant had used a pipe to violently beat the victim, even though they had no reason to believe that he was armed when arrested
  • exigent circumstances existed partly because the officers knew that the defendant had used a pipe to violently beat the victim, even though they had no reason to believe that he was armed when arrested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.