People v. S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that guilty verdicts for theft and robbery had to merge, where “the theft offense was the factual and legal predicate for the robbery”
• holding that guilty verdicts for theft and robbery had to merge, where “the theft offense was the factual and legal predicate for the robbery”
• guilty verdicts for third-degree theft and second- degree robbery had to merge, where “the theft offense was the factual and legal predicate for the robbery”
• trial court erred in failing to merge a robbery verdict and an ordi- nary theft verdict where the same theft formed the basis for both
• robbery subsumes ordinary predicate theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).