People v. Ryan B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding review was de novo where there were uncontested facts and the question was whether the defendant’s act of asking a child a question was enticement or coercion
• applying de novo review to a sufficiency of the evidence challenge to determine if uncontested facts satisfied the statutory elements of the offense
• applying de novo review to a sufficiency of the evidence challenge to determine if uncontested facts satisfied the statutory elements of the offense
• applying de novo review to a sufficiency of the evidence challenge to determine if uncontested facts satisfied the statutory elements of the offense
• de novo review when challenge is whether undisputed facts were sufficient to prove elements of crime under the statute
• the court considered whether asking a minor to lift her shirt amounted to “enticing, coercing or persuading” under the sexual exploitation of a child statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).