People v. Ruel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of relationships with others not involved in the instant action is inadmissible as it is not confined to the matters at issue under the general rule of relevancy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Damnitz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-12-27· cited 36×
• People v. Perry
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-04-18· cited 26×
• People v. Wilbert
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-11-14· cited 24×
• People v. Boisvert
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-04-03· cited 17×
• People v. Harden
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-06-28· cited 10×
• People v. Manion
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-07-27· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The People v. Galloway
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 117×
• The People v. Goodpaster
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1966-10-28· cited 13×
• People v. Dockery
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-06-13· cited 10×