California Supreme Court· 6/12/2000

People v. Rubalcava

Citations

1 P.3d 52
96 Cal. Rptr. 2d 735
23 Cal. 4th 322
2000 Daily Journal DAR 6167
2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4653
2000 Cal. LEXIS 4550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the intent to use a dagger as a stabbing weapon is not an express element of California Penal Code § 12020(a)
holding that the State need not prove intent to use a knife with a three inch blade as a weapon as part of the charge of carrying a concealed weapon
holding that the State need not prove intent to use a knife with a three inch blade as a weapon as part of the charge of carrying a concealed weapon
noting that a “defendant’s intended use of the instrument is neither an element of the offense a nor a defense” under California section 12020(a).
for an offense criminalizing “‘traditionally lawful conduct,’ we construe the statute to contain a ‘knowledge’ element” (quoting People v. Coria, 985 P.2d 970, 978 (Cal. 1999))
for an offense criminalizing “‘traditionally lawful conduct,’ we construe the statute to contain a ‘knowledge’ element” (quoting People v. Coria, 985 P.2d 970, 978 (Cal. 1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Mosk, Werdegar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Rubalcava

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.