Skip to main content
· 5/23/1988

People v. Rowerdink

Citations

  • 756 P.2d 986
  • 12 Brief Times Rptr. 828
  • 1988 Colo. LEXIS 94
  • 1988 WL 50203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court acted within its discretion when admitting rebuttal testimony because any potential prejudice was dispelled by court’s limiting instruction and the parties’ stipulations
  • “The defendant, by requesting joinder of the charges, created the opportunity for the alleged error and prejudice of which he now complains.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mullarkey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.