People v. Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• State as nonprevailing party may be precluded from arguing a new theory on appeal
• State as nonprevailing party may be precluded from arguing a new theory on appeal
• “The discharge of a juror and the impaneling of an alternate is an act of discretion by the trial judge, and absent a clear showing of prejudice, reversal is not required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Long
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-12-31· cited 25×
• People v. Willis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-03-01· cited 25×
• People v. Alvarado
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-28· cited 24×
• People v. Thompson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-03-28· cited 19×
• People v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-12-18· cited 5×
• People v. Ross
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-03-19· cited 3×
• People . Alvarado
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-28