California Court of Appeal· 6/4/1985
People v. Roscoe
Citations
- 168 Cal. App. 3d 1093
- 215 Cal. Rptr. 45
- 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expert testimony permitted to rehabilitate complainant's credibility must be limited to discussion of victims as a class
- expert testimony permitted to rehabilitate complainant’s credibility must be limited to discussion of victims as a class
- although psychologist’s testimony to the effect that 15-year-old complainant was molested was erroneously admitted, expert testimony may properly be admitted for some purposes and error was nonprejudicial
- introduction of expert testimony for purposes of rehabilitating witness’s credibility should be limited to a discussion of victims as a class and should not extend to a discussion and diagnosis of particular witnesses
- introduction of expert testimony for purposes of rehabilitating witness’s credibility should be limited to a discussion of victims as a class and should not extend to a discussion and diagnosis of particular witnesses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tuttle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. Edward Charles L.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-09-21· cited 2,400×
- People v. McAlpinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-07-18· cited 423×
- Duckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-10-10· cited 294×
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-03-02· cited 291×
- People v. BowkerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-07-29· cited 271×
- State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 202×
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-08-02· cited 188×
- United States v. Mark Kevin BinderNinth Circuit· 1985-08-22· cited 185×
- State v. LogueSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-07-31· cited 119×
- Orange County Social Services Agency v. Remberto C.California Court of Appeal· 2001-11-15· cited 118×
- Wheat v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-06-11· cited 87×
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-04-29· cited 75×
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-03-08· cited 69×
- State v. BrodniakMontana Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-06· cited 59×
- People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-11-24· cited 59×
- People v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-08-15· cited 59×
- People v. JeffCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-08-31· cited 54×
- People v. LunaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-08-23· cited 52×
- Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-10-18· cited 41×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.