· 11/9/2009
People v. Ronald M.
Citations
- 395 Ill. App. 3d 972
- 918 N.E.2d 1091
- 335 Ill. Dec. 278
- 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 1091
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that our courts have long held that a motion to substitute is untimely if it was filed after the judge has ruled on a substantive issue in the case
- noting that our courts have long held that a motion to substitute is untimely if it was filed after the judge has ruled on a substantive issue in the case
- an order based on the agreement of the parties may nevertheless be a substantial ruling because the trial court retains the discretion to accept or reject the agreement before issuing the order
- an order based on the agreement of the parties may nevertheless be a substantial ruling because the trial court retains the discretion to accept or reject the agreement before issuing the order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schmidt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.