Skip to main content

Citations

  • 184 Misc. 2d 419
  • 708 N.Y.S.2d 795
  • 2000 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a warrantless search of a closed pet store was justified by the need to rescue animals in need of medical attention
  • extending exigent circumstances to protect animals in danger, in this case the rescue of animals in a pet store in need of medical attention
  • extending exigent circumstances to protect animals in danger, in this case the rescue of animals in a pet store in need of medical attention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.