People v. Roe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecutors afforded wide latitude in closing argument and hyperbole based on the evidence not improper
• finding prosecutor’s hyperbolic speech not improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Majka
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-05-17· cited 14×
• People v. Harris
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-05-19· cited 12×
• People v. Verkruysse
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-05-12· cited 11×
• People v. Taylor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-04-22· cited 7×
• People v. Scott
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-03-20· cited 5×
• People v. Irons
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-08-02· cited 4×
• People v. Majaka
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-05-17

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Collins
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-02-22· cited 2,507×
• People v. Pickett
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 647×
• People v. Young
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 643×
• People v. Phillips
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-03-29· cited 270×
• People v. Johnson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-10-17· cited 261×
• People v. Thompkins
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-01-25· cited 234×
• People v. King
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-01-28· cited 18×
• People v. Evans
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-06-29· cited 12×
• People v. Ellis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-07-18· cited 7×