· 11/3/2005
People v. Rodriguez-Ortiz
Citations
- 23 A.D.3d 204
- 802 N.Y.S.2d 622
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- asking whether “insurer would not have issued the particular contract it did at the same premium had the facts been disclosed”
- asking whether the insurance company would not have issued the specific policy at the identical premium had the insured disclosed the true facts
- “Although materiality is ordinarily a question of fact, where the evidence concerning the materiality is clear and substantially uncontradicted, the matter is one of law for the court to determine.”
- agent’s knowledge of title report is imputed to purchaser
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.