Skip to main content

Citations

  • 92 A.D.3d 902
  • 940 N.Y.2d 647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Viewing the intoxication evidence in the light most favorable to [petitioner], we find that it was insufficient to allow a reasonable person to entertain doubt as to the element of intent”
  • petitioner’s sufficiency claim “is unpreserved for appellate review” and “[i]n any event, viewing the evidence in the light most 11 favorable to the prosecution, we find that it was legally sufficient to establish [petitioner’s] guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.