People v. Rodgers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The principles of consent searches are well established. They are applicable where the consent is implied from actions as well as where expressly granted.”
• defendant's invitation to police to enter his home did not imply consent to enter and search all areas when consent was limited to a specific purpose
• defendant’s invitation to police to enter his home did not imply consent to enter and search all areas when consent was limited to a specific purpose
• investigation of violence call did not justify search beyond the living room
• investigation of violence call did not justify search beyond the living room

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Flippo
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2002-11-27· cited 58×
• People v. Mendoza
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-09-17· cited 24×
• People v. Chavez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-05-11· cited 10×
• People v. Mikrut
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-03-15· cited 9×
• People v. Armstrong
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-04-13· cited 8×
• People v. Dawn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-08-06· cited 3×
• People v. Santovi
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-07-02

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Matlock
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
• People v. Sanders
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-12-16· cited 27×
• People v. Blitz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-04-28· cited 9×