Skip to main content
· 6/4/2002

People v. Roche

Citations

  • 772 N.E.2d 1133
  • 98 N.Y.2d 70
  • 745 N.Y.S.2d 775
  • 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 1500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the defendant’s “attempt to evade detection” undermined the basis for a defense of extreme emotional disturbance
  • refusing EMED jury instruction to defendant who stabbed his wife more than a dozen times
  • trial court not obligated to charge EED defense where evidence showed “defendant acted out of anger or embarrassment or both”
  • “In the absence of the requisite proof, an extreme emotional disturbance charge should not be given because it would invite the jury to engage in impermissible speculation concerning defendant's state of mind at the time of the homicide.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graffeo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.