People v. Rivera-Mateo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a district court must individually weigh the probative value of each conviction when considering admissibility for impeachment
• stating that misdemeanor theft by swindle, theft by fraud, and theft by false representation were crimes involving dishonesty or false statement
• “A fact is relevant if, when taken alone or in connection of other facts, it warrants a jury in drawing a logical inference assisting, even though remotely, the determination of the issue in question.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).