People v. Rivera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identity of the intended target is not an essential element of first-degree assault
• “the identity of the intended target is not an essential element...Therefore, the court's charge to the jury was a permissible constructive amendment to the indictment in that it neither changed the theory of the prosecution nor otherwise prejudiced the defendant on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Harris
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-03-12· cited 21×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-06-05· cited 17×
• People v. Doyle
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-02-28· cited 16×
• People v. Finkelstein
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-10-04

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Contes
  New York Court of Appeals· 1983-09-01· cited 12,727×
• People v. Suitte
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-11-22· cited 10,344×
• People v. Sandoval
  New York Court of Appeals· 1974-06-19· cited 2,008×
• People v. Udzinski
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-04-17· cited 1,127×
• People v. Walker
  New York Court of Appeals· 1994-04-28· cited 726×
• People v. Tucker
  New York Court of Appeals· 1981-12-22· cited 550×