Skip to main content

People v. Rincon

Citations

  • 603 P.2d 953
  • 43 Colo. App. 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that bond was not materially altered when court granted permission for the defendant to travel outside of the state
  • trial court did not materially alter the surety contract by permitting the defendant to leave the state where, as a condition of the bond, defendant agreed to not leave the state without permission
  • there was no material alteration to the surety contract where the trial court permitted defendant to leave the state on the condition that defendant agreed not to leave without permission
  • court holds that trial court did not materially alter the surety contract by permitting the defendant to leave the state where, as a condition of the bond, defendant agreed to not leave the state without permission
  • “The condition was imposed prior to the posting of the bond by [the agent of the surety], and the surety’s failure to inform himself of the existing bond conditions does not relieve him from the responsibility under the bond obligation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Enoch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.