People v. Riemersma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the defendant’s boot print matched a boot print in the snow at the scene of a robbery
• concluding that “sufficient circumstantial evidence was introduced” to corroborate the tracking-dog evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).