People v. Ricks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating as “disclosure” access of grand jury witness to own prior testimony, noting “policy reasons justifying strict preservation of the secrecy” of grand jury proceedings
• treating as \disclosure\ access of grand jury witness to own prior testimony, noting \policy reasons justifying strict preservation of the secrecy\ of grand jury proceedings
• passing mention of intention to tender character evidence instruction and inclusion in list of objections not sufficient to meet Rule 30 standards
• no reversible error where verdict shows jury answered question itself
• “The policy reasons justifying strict preservation of the secrecy of ongoing grand jury proceedings are compelling and should not be lightly discounted simply because a witness asserts an unverified need for a transcript of his prior testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).