California Supreme Court· 5/26/2016
People v. Richards
Citations
- 63 Cal. 4th 291
- 371 P.3d 195
- 202 Cal. Rptr. 3d 678
- 2016 WL 3017139
- 2016 Cal. LEXIS 3594
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim is a type of claim not 14 cognizable on a petition for writ of habeas corpus
- overturning the defendant's conviction where Sperber clearly repudiated his trial testimony that the autopsy photograph depict ed a human bitemark
- under Section 1473 1 by the expert who originally provided the opinion at a hearing or trial or that have been 2 undermined by later scientific research or technological advances.” [§ 1473(e)(1), added by 3 Stats.2014, ch. 623, § 1]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cantil-Sakauye, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. NievesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2021-05-03· cited 173×
- In re FriendCalifornia Supreme Court· 2021-06-28· cited 85×
- People v. JoCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-10-03· cited 71×
- In re LongCalifornia Supreme Court· 2020-11-30· cited 46×
- People v. HicksCalifornia Supreme Court· 2017-12-28· cited 39×
- William Richards v. County of San BernardinoNinth Circuit· 2022-06-24· cited 22×
- In re FigueroaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2018-03-12· cited 21×
- In re MastersCalifornia Supreme Court· 2019-08-12· cited 16×
- Pina v. Cnty. of L. A.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-08-07· cited 11×
- In re RogersCalifornia Supreme Court· 2019-07-15· cited 1×
- In re MilesCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-01-19· cited 1×
- In re MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-01-19
- In re MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-02-10
- People v. JoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-10-03
- Pina v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-08-07
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. STEVEN R. FORTIN (95-09-1197, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2020-06-22
- People v. ZaheerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-09-08
- In re ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-08-03
- People v. FarfanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-11-19
- People v. FarfanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-11-23
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-07-03· cited 7,961×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-01-21· cited 692×
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 661×
- Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-10-13· cited 542×
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-03-24· cited 402×
- In Re SassounianCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-02-02· cited 295×
- People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-03-22· cited 279×
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-06-12· cited 258×
- Ouber v. GuarinoFirst Circuit· 2002-06-17· cited 244×
- In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-02-18· cited 158×
- In Re HallCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-12-17· cited 131×
- People v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 123×
- In Re MaloneCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-03-07· cited 103×
- In Re RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-01-02· cited 45×
- People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-06-24· cited 42×
- Perry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-12-15· cited 40×
- In Re WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-03-16· cited 37×
- In re RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-12-03· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.