Skip to main content

People v. Richards

Citations

  • 63 Cal. 4th 291
  • 371 P.3d 195
  • 202 Cal. Rptr. 3d 678
  • 2016 WL 3017139
  • 2016 Cal. LEXIS 3594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim is a type of claim not 14 cognizable on a petition for writ of habeas corpus
  • overturning the defendant's conviction where Sperber clearly repudiated his trial testimony that the autopsy photograph depict ed a human bitemark
  • under Section 1473 1 by the expert who originally provided the opinion at a hearing or trial or that have been 2 undermined by later scientific research or technological advances.” [§ 1473(e)(1), added by 3 Stats.2014, ch. 623, § 1]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cantil-Sakauye, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.