People v. Richard C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the respondent was provided no written information about the risks and benefits of the medications at issue or any alternatives to medication
• respondent was provided no written information about the risks and benefits of the medications at issue or any alternatives to medication
• “[T]his right to written notification is not subject to a harmless error analysis.”
• court applied capable-of-repetition exception to address merits of appeal because the record showed that respondent was prescribed psychotropic medications in the past and it was reasonable to expect that respondent would be subjected to the same action again
• court applied capable-of-repetition exception to address merits of appeal because the record showed that respondent was prescribed psychotropic medications in the past and it was reasonable to expect that respondent would be subjected to the same action again
• court applied capable-of-repetition exception to address merits of appeal because the record showed that respondent was prescribed psychotropic medications in the past and it was reasonable to expect that respondent would be subjected to the same action again

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).