People v. R.F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insufficient foundation provided by State for admission of controlled substance required outright reversal
• insufficient foundation provided by State for admission of controlled substance required outright reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Hill
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-12-24· cited 47×
• People v. Cowans
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-12-06· cited 43×
• People v. MacIas
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-09-30· cited 35×
• People v. Moore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-11-15· cited 5×
• In Re RF
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-07-27

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Olivera
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-01-19· cited 241×
• People v. Mink
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 138×
• The PEOPLE v. Maurice
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1964-11-24· cited 34×
• People v. Terry
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-03-28· cited 23×