Skip to main content
· 4/4/1996

People v. Requejo

Citations

  • 919 P.2d 874
  • 20 Brief Times Rptr. 473
  • 1996 Colo. App. LEXIS 106
  • 1996 WL 154530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that officer’s simple question directed towards locating a weapon was legitimately asked for officer safety reasons
  • concluding that officer's simple question directed towards locating a weapon was legitimately asked for officer safety reasons
  • concluding that “mental slowness” didn’t meet the definition of “mental disease or defect” because it wasn’t “severely abnormal” and didn’t “grossly and demonstrably impair [the] ‘perception’ of reality”
  • holding that an officer’s question about the location of a knife fell within the exception because it was justified to “protect the safety of officers engaged in immediate, on-scene investigation of a crime”
  • applying exception “to protect the safety of officers engaged in immediate, on-scene investigation of a crime”
  • error not harmless if it affects the outcome of the trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davidson, Hume, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.