People v. Renfro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• telephone cable valued in larceny case through evidence of replacement cost, under rule that “where . property has a unique or restricted use and an extremely limited market, the actual or replacement cost to the one from whom it was stolen is its fair market value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ellis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-03-10· cited 32×
• State v. Matzker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1973-09-18· cited 18×
• State v. Savage
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1980-02-20· cited 17×
• State v. Robinson
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1980-03-07· cited 15×
• State v. Ensz
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-07-14· cited 12×
• Cleveland v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1969-11-26· cited 11×
• McCullar v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1968-07-12· cited 6×
• Bain v. Sheriff, Clark County
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1972-12-29· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Kirkpatrick
  Supreme Court· 1824-03-23· cited 453×
• People v. Daugherty
  California Supreme Court· 1953-05-05· cited 337×
• People v. Hillery
  California Supreme Court· 1965-05-03· cited 333×
• People v. Robillard
  California Supreme Court· 1960-12-29· cited 215×
• Sublett v. Henry's Turk & Taylor Lunch
  California Supreme Court· 1942-12-01· cited 36×
• People v. Cook
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-04-05· cited 27×
• Daugherty v. California
  Supreme Court· 1953-10-12· cited 15×
• People v. Lenahan
  California Court of Appeal· 1940-03-18· cited 7×
• Robillard v. California
  Supreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 6×
• People v. Lathrop
  California Court of Appeal· 1940-02-16· cited 5×