People v. R.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• word “may” directed at party indicates party has discretion to request but trial court does not have discretion to deny it if made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Katarzyna G.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-10-15· cited 17×
• People v. Dru G.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-12-20· cited 4×
• People v. Collins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-12-21· cited 1×
• In re: Angela A.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-10-01
• In Re RC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-03-26
• In re: Dru G.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-12-20

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Barbara H.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-22· cited 271×
• People v. Mary Ann P.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2002-11-21· cited 155×
• Gonzalez v. Profile Sanding Equipment, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-16· cited 48×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-01-14· cited 20×
• In Re Barnard
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-07-20· cited 20×
• People v. Branning
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-12-18· cited 18×
• Matter of Katz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-11-16· cited 15×
• People v. Jennifer H.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-13· cited 11×
• Brelje v. Pates
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-08-25· cited 10×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-05-14· cited 9×
• Yoder v. People
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-06-24· cited 8×
• In re R.K. Replaces opinion filed 1/17/03 which has been withdrawn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-02-21· cited 6×