People v. Rasheed A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that amendments to the Clean Water Act displaced the nuisance claim recog nized in Milwaukee I
• holding that amendments to the Clean Water Act displaced the nuisance claim recognized in Milwaukee I
• recognizing that “federal courts create federal common law only as a necessary expedient when problems requiring federal answers are not addressed by federal statutory law”
• holding that the CWA replaced the prior federal common law regarding the regulation of water pollution, in a case addressing discharges into Lake Michigan
• holding that the Federal W ater Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 displaced a federal common law nuisance claim for pollution of Lake Michigan
• holding that “the Clean Air Act and the EPA actions it authorizes displace any federal common-law right to seek abatement of carbon-dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel fired powerplants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).