People v. Ranstrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refuting defendant's argument that trial court should have limited the evidence presented regarding his obsession
• refuting defendant’s argument that trial court should have limited the evidence presented regarding.his obsession
• “We conclude that the attack on [the victim] would be difficult to explain without introducing a substantial amount of the evidence concerning defendant’s obsessive behavior toward [the defendant’s ex-girlfriend].”
• \We conclude that the attack on [the victim] would be difficult to explain without introducing a substantial amount of the evidence concerning defendant's obsessive behavior toward [the defendant's ex-girlfriend].\
• detailed evidence of the defendant’s profound obsession with his former girlfriend, including instances where he stalked, terrorized, and burglarized her, were properly admitted to show the defendant’s intent and motive for the attack on her new boyfriend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).