People v. Ramunni

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling “any subjective expectation of privacy the defendant may have had [in a common area basement] was not objectively reasonable.”
• rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on counsel's failure to introduce records where substance of records was already before the jury
• focusing on factors not involving government's intrusion 4 to determine whether defendant had reasonable expectation of privacy
• rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on counsel’s failure to introduce records where substance of records was already before the jury
• standing may be established where defendant has either \a possessory interest in the place searched or in the property seized or if [he] was present when the search occurred\
• standing and expectation of privacy are “interrelated” concepts but considered separately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).