Illinois Supreme Court· 9/24/1992

People v. Ramey

Citations

603 N.E.2d 519
151 Ill. 2d 498
177 Ill. Dec. 449
1992 Ill. LEXIS 123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment is not violated by the admission of hearsay statements under the coconspirator exception to the hearsay rule, where the defendant was able to confront and cross-examine the witness who claimed that the statements at issue were made
recognizing that home invasion is a forcible felony
holding that the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment is not violated by the admission of hearsay statements under the coconspirator exception to the hearsay rule, where the defendant was able to confront and cross-examine the witness who claimed that the statements at issue were made
recognizing that home invasion is a forcible felony
allowing non-IPI jury instruction where it explained concepts not covered by the IPI instructions
allowing non-IPI jury instruction where it explained concepts not covered by the IPI instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas J. Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.