People v. Radovick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the admission of grand jury testimony under section 115-10.1 was improper because it contained “double hearsay and evidence of other crimes”
• finding no abuse of discretion by trial court for excluding grand jury testimony because the State is developing its case and “would have had Httle motive to ehaHenge [a witness’s] version of events at this time”
• even if statement is admitted substantively under section 115-10.1 of Code, that section does not abrogate other rules of evidence, including ban on double hearsay
• “the admission of these transcripts was improper because they contained double hearsay”
• “the admission of these transcripts was improper because they contained double hearsay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).