Appellate Court of Illinois· 10/6/1995

People v. Radovick

Citations

656 N.E.2d 235
212 Ill. Dec. 82
275 Ill. App. 3d 809
1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 777

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the admission of grand jury testimony under section 115-10.1 was improper because it contained “double hearsay and evidence of other crimes”
finding no abuse of discretion by trial court for excluding grand jury testimony because the State is developing its case and “would have had Httle motive to ehaHenge [a witness’s] version of events at this time”
even if statement is admitted substantively under section 115-10.1 of Code, that section does not abrogate other rules of evidence, including ban on double hearsay
“the admission of these transcripts was improper because they contained double hearsay”
“the admission of these transcripts was improper because they contained double hearsay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.